Human Rights Law Network

Consider blind students' plea, SC tells Delhi University

E-mail Print option in slimbox / lytebox? (info) PDF

Sambhavana Versus University of Delhi   ( CIVIL APPEAL No. 4722-4723 OF 2013)

The Organisation Sambhavna and HRLN's Lawyer Pankaj Sinha, has filed a Petition in the Apex Court Bench of Justice B.S.Chauhan and Justice Dipak Misra while addressing to Blind Students to examine the grievances on the introduction of Maths and Science in Delhi University in  the Four year Undergraduate Program which has to be started from current academic year.

"By refusing to stay the introduction of FYUP, the court has made the entire case in fructuous vide its interim order dated May 15, 2013. Once the admission process commences, and adequate provisions for vision impaired students have not been made, it would become impossible for the university to revert to the existing system of three years degree program. It would cause a number of hardships and irreparable loss to about 800-1,000 visually impaired students," a statement by NGO Sambhavana said on 26 May 2013.

Pankaj Sinha, advocate said: "It is not possible to bring about necessary changes — especially with regard to infrastructure — within the time period. There is the issue of providing reading material in accessible format. It has been a while since DU shifted to the semester system, but they have not been able to provide accessible reading material to students with disabilities."

Supreme Courts says as below in the order…

We  are  absolutely  conscious  that  there  is  an enactment  but  India  has  shown  its  concern  by ratifying the said Convention and, therefore, we have reproduced  the  same.   When  the  University  has thought of imparting education in a different way, it has  to  bear  in  mind  the  need  of  sensitivity  and expected  societal  responsiveness.   A visually impaired student is entitled to receive special treatment.  Under the constitutional frame the State has to have policies for such categories of people. Article 41 of the Constitution of India casts a duty on the State to make effective provisions for securing, inter alia, the rights of the disabled and those suffering from other infirmities within the limits of economic capacity and development.  It is imperative that the authorities look into the real grievances of the visually impaired people as that is the constitutional and statutory policy.  The University has to live the role of Loco Parentis and show its concern to redress the grievances in proper perspective.  Not for nothing Ralph Waldo Emerson had said “the secret of education is respecting pupil”.

Thus, the necessity of the visually impaired students should have primacy in the mind of the Empowered

Committee of the University.  Education for visually impaired students is a great hope for them and such a hope is the brightest bliss in their lives.  History has recorded  with  pride  that  some  men  with  visual impairment  have  shown  high  intellectual  prowess.

The anguish and despondency in the life of Milton, the famous English poet, did not deter him to carry out the mission of his life.  Lack of vision could not destroy his Will power.  Needless to say that he had the support of the society.  The ancient sage “Ashtavakra” while laying down the traffic rules had categorically stated that the blind man has the first right on the road.  Thus, emphasis has always been laid on the visually impaired persons for many a reason.  When we say so, we may not be understood to  have  said  that  otherwise  impaired  or  disabled people  are  to  be  treated  differently  in  the constitutional and statutory scheme.  We have only laid emphasis on the visually impaired students for the purpose of present case.  It is the need of the present time that the University shall look into the matter and mitigate the grievances of the visually impaired students as far as possible.   We have already indicated that we are not experts.  But we are disposed to think that the problem has remained unsolved.  The same is required to be addressed to in an opposite manner.  We do not intend to say that it has not at all been addressed but there has to be more focus, more empathy and more sensitivity.

Therefore, we permit the appellant-organisation to submit a representation indicating its grievances and the views to the said Committee within three days which shall be dealt with by the Committee within a week hence.


Contact Person: Adv Pankaj Sinha
Contact Number: +91-9910247816


Promote & Support Human Rights Law Network !



Human Rights Law Network Compendium



Contact Us

Human Rights Law Network
c/o Socio-Legal Information Centre
576, Masjid Road, Jungpura
New Delhi - 110014
+91-11-24374502 (Fax)

Facebook_Human Rights Law Network Youtube_Human Rights Law Network Twitter_Human Rights Law Network
BlogSpot_Human Rights Law Network LinkedIN_Human Rights Law Network Google Group_Human Rights Law Network

Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) is a division of the Socio-Legal Information Centre (SLIC). SLIC is a non-profit legal aid and educational organization, registered under the Registration of Societies Act, 1860, Indian Public Trust Act, 1950 and the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 1976.

HRLN is a division of the Socio-Legal Information Centre (SLIC). SLIC is a non-profit legal aid and educational organization, registered under the Registration of Societies Act, 1860, Indian Public Trust Act, 1950 and the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 1976.