Human Rights Law Network

Media Reports

Rules on Jail Visitors Board face stiff objection

E-mail Print option in slimbox / lytebox? (info) PDF

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday directed the Delhi government to submit copies of the Delhi Prisons Act, 1988, as well as the old and new rules framed by it regarding a Jail Visiters’ Board in the capital, after a number of PILs raised objections the rules governing the watchdog body.

Last year, the Delhi High Court directed the government to create a Jail Visitors Board — a watchdog body mandated under the Delhi Prisons Act, 1988, to keep an eye on condition of prisoners in jail — after a number of PILs were filed regarding problems in jails. In May 2014, the Delhi government notified the Jail Visitors Panel and rules governing the body. The panel of visitors, including a panel of officials and a separate panel of non-officials from NGOs and other organisations, was created in March this year, and rules regarding the panel were notified in May. However, during the hearing before the court of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S End law on Tuesday, objections were raised against the notified rules.

Advocate Colin Gonsalves of Human Rights Law Network and Advocate Anant Asthana said that the Panel has been constituted under rules which were created for the Delhi Prisons Act, 1988. However, the Act was modified in 2000, and the government created fresh rules in May this year


Cos use foreign money for political funding. Isn’t that influencing polls?

E-mail Print option in slimbox / lytebox? (info) PDF

A recent Intelligence Bureau (IB) report has claimed that some well-known NGOs are working to stall economic development at the behest of their foreign donors. Activists and rights groups have been up in arms ever since the report was leaked. In an interview with Fawaz Shaheen, Colin Gonsalves, eminent Supreme Court lawyer, constitutional expert and founder of the Human Rights Law Network, discusses foreign funding and the fears of India's civil rights activists:

The leaked IB report claims that under the garb of "people-centric issues" certain NGOs are working to stall development projects, resulting in a loss of about 2-3 % of the GDP. Do you agree with this assessment? 
Not at all, this is an issue of environmental protection. Let's take the nuclear energy issue. There are some sections of society that point out its adverse effects. These are not people who are anti-national. It is their point of view, in the nation's interest, that India should go towards renewable sources of energy and that nuclear power is dangerous. We must recognize that these activists are doing a public service, which many people may disagree with. But they don't have the state power to enforce their point of view, all they can do is they can write and talk. That is a constitutionally protected activity. 


10 years on, Justice eludes Manorama Devi's family

E-mail Print option in slimbox / lytebox? (info) PDF

Almost 10 years have passed since the brutal rape and murder of Manipur's Manorama Devi that shocked the nation and exposed the abuse of Armed Forces Special Powers Act in North-East India. Little has been done by the Government to bring the perpetrators behind the bar even after a decade of protest.

The protest intensified with Iron Lady of Manipur Irom Charu Sharmila fasting for almost 14 years demanding Government's attention to human rights violation in Manipur and repealing of Armed Forces Special Powers Act. Friday was the tenth anniversary of the killing of 34-year-old Thangjam Manorama Devi in Manipur allegedly by Assam Rifles personnel and people from different groups like human rights, political groups and democratic rights who held a protest march in Jantar Mantar, New Delhi.

This case of Manorama Devi has become a very symbolic case because after this incident on July 11, 2004, 12 women held a naked protest in Imphal. From this moment this movement became very symbolic against the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. Armed Forces Special powers act(AFSPA) is a draconian act and the Supreme Court says that it should be repealed but till now nothing has been done in this direction," says Rojio Usham from Manipur who has protesting at Jantar Mantar demanding repealing of AFSPA.


Pending cases mount at State Human Rights panel

E-mail Print option in slimbox / lytebox? (info) PDF

Since 2001, and till February 2014, as many as 15,266 cases had been filed before the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission (MSHRC), but the panel has been able to disposed of less than a thousand of them. As many as 14,285 cases are still pending; documents accessed under the Right to Information (RTI) have revealed. Constituted under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, the MSHRC, headed by Justice B R Bannurmath, looks into the various cases of violation of human rights. Refusal of the police to file FIR, alleged action by the police, and denial of human rights of HIV/AIDS infected people, custodial deaths and other kinds of complaints are looked into by the commission. No fee or stamp paper is required to move the commission, and for many it is the last resort for justice.

According to documents furnished by the commission in reply to an application filed by The Indian Express, pendency at the MSHRC in 2001-02 was nil. Till February 2014, the highest numbers of complaints (7,208) were received in 2008-09, while the least number of 1,454 complaints were received in 2001-02. Since 2008, the number of complaints has gone down. The number of cases disposed of has taken a plunge from 2011-12, with the year 2012-13 and the period between April 1, 2013 and August 31, 2013, witnessing zero cases being settled. The highest number of complaints disposed of after report/hearing was in 2008-09 when 3,402 cases were solved. Relief was awarded in as many as 347 of them. The same year had seen 8,563 cases being disposed of in total, the highest in the given time period.


SC seeks response of Centre, states on violation of Right to Education Act

E-mail Print option in slimbox / lytebox? (info) PDF

The Supreme Court on April 11 2014 sought response of the Centre, all states and Union Territories on a petition alleging that there was violation of Right to Education (RTE) Act in schools across the country and sought its proper implementation. A bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam issued notice and sought their response after summer vacation on a plea filed by an organisation, National Coalition for Education. The plea said lack of resources and failure to implement provisions of the RTE Act has resulted in a significant decline in education performance.

Human Rights Senior Lawyer Colin Gonsalves sought a direction to all the states to complete the required neighbourhood mapping within six months and new schools be constructed six months after completion of the process. The petition asked the states and UTs to recruit and train one lakh additional professionally trained teachers to end the shortage of educators within a year. It sought a direction that "the states and UTs upgrade all deficient schools with appropriate physical infrastructure so as to be in compliance with the RTE Act within six months."The states and UTs regularise and make permanent all contract and para-teachers in the country,"

Page 4 of 34


Human Rights Law Network Compendium



Contact Us

Human Rights Law Network
c/o Socio-Legal Information Centre
576, Masjid Road, Jungpura
New Delhi - 110014
+91-11-24374502 (Fax)

Facebook_Human Rights Law Network Youtube_Human Rights Law Network Twitter_Human Rights Law Network
BlogSpot_Human Rights Law Network LinkedIN_Human Rights Law Network Google Group_Human Rights Law Network

Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) is a division of the Socio-Legal Information Centre (SLIC). SLIC is a non-profit legal aid and educational organization, registered under the Registration of Societies Act, 1860, Indian Public Trust Act, 1950 and the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 1976.

HRLN is a division of the Socio-Legal Information Centre (SLIC). SLIC is a non-profit legal aid and educational organization, registered under the Registration of Societies Act, 1860, Indian Public Trust Act, 1950 and the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 1976.